Rtx 3060 Ti Vs 2070 Super
Cost at present 781$ Games supported 100% Price now 540$ Games supported 100% Comparing of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters. Value for coin To go the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and heave clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and adding speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Notation that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Data on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it'south interface and passenger vehicle (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Parameters of retentiveness installed: its blazon, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Annotation that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of organisation RAM. Types and number of video connectors nowadays on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this department is precise merely for desktop reference ones (then-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA fries). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the carte du jour itself. Supported technological solutions. This data volition prove useful if you need some item technology for your purposes. APIs supported, including detail versions of those APIs. Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall criterion performance is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined benchmark operation rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, just if you discover some perceived inconsistencies, experience free to speak upwards in comments department, nosotros usually fix bug quickly. This is probably the nearly ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four dissever benchmarks for Direct3D versions ix, 10, xi and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Criterion coverage: 25% 3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark past Futuremark. It used four tests based on ii scenes, ane being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abased temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being washed in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded past Fourth dimension Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX eleven feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Water ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in Jan 2020 and replaced past 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a peppery animate being seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics bill of fare benchmark combined from eleven different exam scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU'southward processing ability, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Grouping. Benchmark coverage: 9% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics menu benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing ability, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 dissimilar test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU'south processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: 5% Let's run into how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Item gaming criterion results are measured in FPS. Here are the average frames per second in a big set of pop games across different resolutions: +0% +0% −sixteen.iii% +xvi.iii% −8% +8% −22.nine% +22.9% +165% −165% +two.6% −2.6% −26.2% +26.two% −15.6% +15.vi% −14.nine% +14.9% +159% −159% −25.2% +25.2% −31.6% +31.vi% −23.6% +23.6% −9.9% +nine.9% −15.6% +15.half-dozen% −9.v% +9.five% −twenty.4% +twenty.4% +104% −104% +0% +0% −25.9% +25.9% −xiv.9% +14.9% −fourteen% +fourteen% +126% −126% −33.three% +33.3% −26.4% +26.iv% −32.eight% +32.8% −26.3% +26.three% −22.5% +22.v% −13.5% +13.five% −15.4% +15.4% −12.one% +12.1% −20% +20% −6.9% +half dozen.9% −25.7% +25.7% −13.eight% +13.8% −13.1% +13.ane% −11.2% +11.ii% −13.2% +13.2% +39.seven% −39.7% +48.five% −48.5% −46% +46% −20% +20% −29.5% +29.5% −25.six% +25.half-dozen% −14% +14% −13.2% +13.2% −18.1% +18.1% −ten.half dozen% +10.6% −xviii.iii% +18.3% −9.3% +9.3% −20% +20% −15.7% +15.7% −23.6% +23.6% −23.6% +23.6% −43.ii% +43.2% −19.4% +xix.4% −35.7% +35.seven% −27.three% +27.3% −xx.9% +20.9% −15.four% +15.4% −25% +25% −22.6% +22.vi% −13.6% +13.6% −20.four% +twenty.4% −xvi.1% +16.ane% −22.6% +22.6% −thirteen.eight% +13.8% Judging by the results of constructed and gaming tests, Technical Metropolis recommends NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti since it shows meliorate performance. Should you nonetheless accept questions concerning option betwixt the reviewed GPUs, inquire them in Comments department, and we shall answer. Do you think we are correct or mistaken in our choice? Vote past clicking "Similar" button well-nigh your favorite graphics bill of fare. The nearest GeForce RTX 2070 Super's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 6700 XT, which is faster by 4% and higher by vii positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 2070 Super: The nearest GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 6800, which is faster by two% and higher by i position in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 3060 Ti: We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Here you can meet the user rating of the graphics cards, too every bit charge per unit them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super on a calibration of ane to 5: Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on a scale of 1 to five: Here you lot can inquire a question about this comparing, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPSRTX 2070 Super vs RTX 3060 Ti
General info
Identify in performance rating 38 eighteen Value for money 36.xviii 62.07 Architecture Turing (2018−2021) Ampere (2020−2022) GPU lawmaking name Turing TU104 Ampere GA104 Market segment Desktop Desktop Release date 2 July 2019 (3 years agone) 1 December 2020 (i year agone) Launch cost (MSRP) $499 $399 Price now $781 (1.6x MSRP) $540 (1.4x MSRP) Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 2560 no information Core clock speed 1605 MHz no data Boost clock speed 1770 MHz no data Number of transistors 13,600 million 17,400 million Manufacturing process engineering 12 nm 8 nm Thermal blueprint ability (TDP) 215 Watt no data Texture fill rate 283.2 253.1 Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface PCIe three.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16 Length 267 mm 242 mm Width two-slot no information Supplementary ability connectors 1x half dozen-pin + 1x 8-pin no data Memory
Memory type GDDR6 no data Maximum RAM corporeality 8 GB no information Retentiveness bus width 256 Bit no data Retentiveness clock speed 14000 MHz no data Memory bandwidth 448.0 GB/s no data Shared memory - - Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C no data HDMI + no data One thousand-SYNC support + no data Technologies
API back up
DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_1) no information Shader Model half-dozen.5 6.five OpenGL 4.half dozen no information OpenCL 1.ii no data Vulkan 1.two.131 1.ii CUDA 7.5 8.half dozen Benchmark functioning
Overall score
Gaming performance
Total Hard disk drive 138 144 1440p 92 92 4K 64 60 Full Hard disk drive
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 80 78 Total HD
Medium Preset
Assassin'south Creed Odyssey 104 121 Assassinator's Creed Valhalla 88 95 Battlefield 5 118 145 Telephone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 180 65−70 Cyberpunk 2077 eighty 78 Far Cry 5 122 154 Far Cry New Dawn 96 111 Forza Horizon 4 174 200 Hitman 3 176 65−seventy Horizon Zero Dawn 111 139 Ruddy Dead Redemption 2 117 154 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 127 157 Watch Dogs: Legion 111 122 Full HD
High Preset
Assassin'due south Creed Odyssey ninety 104 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 74 81 Battlefield 5 103 124 Call of Duty: Mod Warfare 139 65−70 Cyberpunk 2077 78 78 Far Cry 5 116 146 Far Cry New Dawn 94 108 Forza Horizon four 172 196 Hitman 3 154 65−70 Horizon Nix Dawn 87 116 Metro Exodus 87 110 Red Dead Redemption 2 67 89 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 118 149 The Witcher iii: Wild Chase 178 218 Watch Dogs: Legion 96 109 Full Hard disk drive
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65 75 Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla 66 74 Battlefield 5 95 114 Cyberpunk 2077 72 77 Far Weep v 109 137 Far Cry New Dawn 87 99 Forza Horizon 4 153 173 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98 109 Sentinel Dogs: Legion 68 77 1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95 65−70 Hitman 3 101 65−lxx Horizon Cypher Dawn 63 92 Metro Exodus 55 66 Red Dead Redemption 2 44 57 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 82 103 1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 57 65 Assassinator'due south Creed Valhalla 53 60 Battlefield 5 83 98 Cyberpunk 2077 47 52 Far Cry 5 93 110 Far Cry New Dawn 86 94 Forza Horizon iv 125 150 Picket Dogs: Legion 51 59 4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modernistic Warfare 55 65−70 Hitman three 55 65−seventy Horizon Zero Dawn 37 53 Metro Exodus 36 43 Reddish Expressionless Redemption ii 28 38 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 44 56 The Witcher iii: Wild Hunt 67 81 4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 39 45 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32 40 Battleground five 53 65 Cyberpunk 2077 22 25 Far Cry 5 54 65 Far Cry New Dawn 56 65 Forza Horizon four 84 103 Sentry Dogs: Legion 29 33 Advantages and disadvantages
Operation rating 61.04 68.26 Novelty 2 July 2019 1 Dec 2020 Cost $499 $399 Chip lithography 12 nm eight nm
Bandage your vote
Competitors of GeForce RTX 2070 Super by AMD
Competitors of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti by AMD
Similar GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-RTX-2070-Super-vs-GeForce-RTX-3060-Ti
0 Response to "Rtx 3060 Ti Vs 2070 Super"
Post a Comment